Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to footer

Beyond Boundaries: Reimaging Medical Appraisal


If you experience a problem viewing the above video, please visit:  https://vimeo.com/1116187940


# Scottish Medical Appraisers Conference sessions
02

Beyond boundaries: Reimagining Medical Appraisal

Cross specialty appraisal is fast becoming common place between secondary care colleagues, and even between primary and secondary care colleagues.  In this session we explored the benefits and logistics of cross specialty appraisals, areas of different challenges and common grounds.

Speakers:

  • (Pre-recorded) Dr Barbara Chandler (NHS Highland SC Appraisal Lead)
  • (Pre-recorded) Dr Iain Jamieson (NHS Ayrshire & Arran PC Appraisal Lead)

Q&A Panel:

  • Dr Carol Buchanan (NHS Grampian PC Appraisal Lead)
  • Dr George Fernie (NSS Appraisal Lead)
  • Dr Veronica Leach (NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde SC Appraisal Lead)
  • Dr David Stephens (NHS Highland PC joint Appraisal Lead)

 

Notes from Q&A:

  • Would you approve someone to discuss SAI to MDU or BMA and how much information they can share with these outside bodies under GDPR rules?

    Assuming that the appraiser will have used the standard form of words at the beginning of the appraisal that although normally confidential, there may be [exceptional] circumstances where because of concerns about patient safety, information may have to be shared.

  • How will cross specialty appraisal work as payment and organisation will be very different across primary and secondary care?

    It depends on the health board management and resources - for example, in NSS cross specialty appraisal is built-in as standard practice through job planning, appraising doctors from a variety of origins and specialties.

  • I always worry that if the PSQ is left until year 5 something happens that year say illness and this is an issue to revalidation.

    Practice and guidance can differ from board to board, however it is probably sensible not to leave it until the last moment (although we seem to have been able to work round this during and coming out of Covid).  ROs can also defer a doctor's revalidation, which is a neutral act, for 6 - 12 months as needed.

  • Some folk have difficulty getting their patient feedback often relating to their specialty, so it can be good to advise starting early as not having enough feedback can result in a delay in recommending revalidation. 

  • [reply from Dr George Fernie, SC Appraisal Lead NSS] Most of the doctors I appraise do not provide direct clinical care so it's not an issue. As a rule, the HB where clinical care is being delivered has primacy so those colleagues would normally be appraised there with a 'letter of comfort' from the other board so that all aspects are covered in a single appraisal. I happen to be an exception in that my main role is with HIS but in Lothian we can only submit indirect anonymised PSQ as 'patients' are either potentially violent/under the influence in police custody, victims of serious crime or suspects - hence PSQs are not applicable.

  • Has retire and return been considered in NHS Scotland to assist with availability of appraisers?

  • The ethos should be that the appraiser has a licence to practise and [partial] retirement per se is not a reason to not to do this – see comments above re those who do not see patients.

  • We also raised issues around the administration/ allocation of appraisees across primary and secondary care in view of timelines and expectations. We felt that there was definitely some value and positive aspects to this model.

  • This does need to be factored in but agree there are benefits.

  • In secondary care NHSH we are not individually funded to do appraisals. Those of us that do it are using SPA time.  Many staff will not feel able to donate their SPA time to doing appraisal - so the organisation will need to buy more consultants or persons who can have SPA to do appraisal.

  • Management of this differs between boards but some do this within the job plan and not in SPA. There should be a distinction between using SPA in preparation for your own appraisal and revalidation, as opposed to undertaking appraisal of others.

  • Joint appraisal sounds much more threatening to me.

  • Rapport and balanced authority might be more difficult to achieve between three different personalities.

  • I've never managed to get an academic appraiser to do a joint appraisal!
  • Logistical issues can vary between individuals.  NSS (and GG&C) have a number of doctors requiring joint appraisal and have regularly achieved this where this is a requirement; and reports that it seems to function well in reality.

  • In England there is no time limit after retirement from clinical work that appraisers can continue to work.

  • As set out in the Medical Appraisal Guidance Scotland, normally an appraiser will be in current practice or within 3 years of retirement.  Exceptional circumstances will be considered at the RO's discretion.

  • In secondary care in NHS Highland we have folk who have retired from clinical practice who are then employed via our locum bank to just do appraisals. These are funded individually for each appraisal. Some will have been appraisers already and others wish to train as a new appraiser which has happened recently. Without this body of doctors it would be difficult to have enough doctors to undertake our appraisals.

There were other general comments around whether clinically retired appraisers require appraisal or licence to practice (LtP) to remain an appraiser.  Whilst LtP is not a necessity to remain an appraiser, you are expected to remain on the GMC register.  We will explore more on this topic in the webinar "Medico-Legal Awareness for Appraisers" on 29th October from 12:30pm to 1:30pm.  This session will be recorded and shared afterwards for those unable to attend.


Recap of quotes shared from presentation:

Pros (from secondary care appraisees)

  • I found the appraisal experience provided a good balance of support and challenge.
  • My appraiser made the experience a positive one and was very engaged and responsive to my comments and concerns.
  • Excellent appraisal experience, didn’t matter at all that my appraiser was from primary care – it’s more important that you develop a rapport and therefore generate a useful discussion and reflection, which I was able to do.
  • Good to chat with someone from another speciality and have a bit of a moan (plus giving you the solidarity that you are not alone).
  • Forces you really have to explain your practice clearly and what it involves.
  • Had a very good experience - well prepared. Knowledge of the specialty didn’t matter much - life insights mattered more.

Pros (from primary care appraisers)

  • Preparation does take a little longer. Rapport was no different and if anything enhanced by the circumstances.
  • Much more positive experience for me - the doctor approached his appraisal more positively than I was used to with GPs. I felt the doctor trusted and valued me spending time with them.
  • There was no sense that I was judging them which I have felt with some GP colleagues.
  • The approach to appraisal is fundamentally the same.
  • A few secondary care appraisals can “break up” the routine of primary care ones!
  • Had some positive experience of 'ideas sharing' and the primary care perspective has been useful for the secondary care appraisee. Similarly, there have been useful take home notes for me as a GP.

Challenges (from secondary care appraisees)

  • Wasn’t sure whether they would completely understand my role.
  • I don’t/have never found the appraisal process particularly useful in any case, but it was good having a discussion with my appraiser.
  • The whole appraisal process seems a bit tired and irrelevant. Perhaps, my own lack of engagement in the process resulted in a poorer experience.
  • I worry that a bad SC appraisee could easily pull the wool over a GP appraiser's eyes by baffling them with technical info that they are perhaps not familiar with.
  • I need to really explain my job, what I do and why… I really don't mind doing this but some may?
  • I'm not sure that every primary care appraiser would be well suited to secondary care.
  • I think that there would be more benefit from being appraised by a representative of the same specialty, so some specific issues could be discussed more in depth.

Challenges (from primary care appraisers)

  • I struggle to understand Job Plans, but it seems that is not unique to me, some of the appraisees also seem to struggle.
  • Preparation does take a little longer with unfamiliarity with different clinical expertise and the roles of different colleges in appraisal
  • It’s perhaps slightly harder to get my head around the secondary care doctor’s working patterns, but once that’s done, the Form 4 writes similarly to primary care ones
  • My impression is that the secondary care doctors are not expecting reflection or help with identifying development needs. Their bar is set fairly low from my experience.
  • I found the write up a little more challenging as I have less knowledge of the role of the individuals.
  • Understanding some content can be difficult (ultra-specialised evidence) but this can be a rewarding experience.
  • Limited understanding of departmental / managerial structures so may have less tools in the toolkit to help with specific issues rather than generic signposting.
  • SEA evidence is often more limited (have to request additional evidence in advance) – meetings etc rather than a more formal SEA with appropriate reflection

Reflections from both boards

  • I quite prefer to not be appraised by my own specialty. It’s a small world with doctors and an even smaller one if one looks at a single specialty. I feel more comfortable not being in that sphere for my appraisal. I can be more open.
  • Excellent appraisal experience, didn’t matter at all that my appraiser was from primary care – it’s more important that you develop a rapport and therefore generate a useful discussion and reflection, which I was able to do.
  • [From appraiser]  Gain greater insight into secondary care & appreciation of the challenges they face.

Related Documents

Beyond Boundaries: Reimagining Medical Appraisal (slides)

Date updated: 05/09/2025

Size: 789816 - KB

Type: pdf



This page was last updated on: 08/09/2025